Considering clarity in phrasing

The title mentions Real Madrid is behind Barcelona, but I need to verify the current table before asserting anything. I could present a scenario about the pressure being on them after being overtaken. Regarding previous head-to-head losses against Girona, I can only state that history shows they have struggled. To avoid misinformation, a more cautious statement would be to say that recent matches suggest Madrid has the upper hand against Girona. Asking the user if they want a preview article could help clarify their needs.Drafting a concise preview

The guideline recommends asking for user preferences only when necessary, while also suggesting I can provide a short preview now. I think it's best to include a concise preview with bullet points covering key aspects: background, current status, tactics, injuries, key matchups, possible lineups, and predictions.

I should keep the tone crisp and avoid too much formatting. It seems wise to avoid citing specific injuries unless I clearly state that details may change. Asking for the match date could also be a good idea.Preparing a compact preview

I’m thinking that this could lead to a question. According to the guidelines, I should only ask for clarifications when necessary. It makes sense to give a compact, general preview first and then check if the user wants more in-depth details like statistics, starting lineups, or odds.

So, I’ll provide that initial summary and follow up with the question about whether they’d like those additional details. This approach feels efficient and user-friendly!

\n